| |
| |
Distinction
A++ 92
Pass with Distinction (High)
A+ 84
Pass with Distinction (Middle)
A 76
Pass with Distinction (Low) |
Merit
B+ 68
Pass with Merit (High)
B 64
Pass with Merit (Low)
|
Pass
C+ 58
Pass (High)
C 54
Pass (Low)
|
Marginal Fail
F+ 47
Marginal Fail
|
Fail
F 37
Clear Fail
F- 27
Comprehensive Fail
WF 12
Weak Fail
U 2
Unclassified |
| Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of theories of anti-discriminatory and anti-oppressive practice and application in community development practice. |
Exceptional knowledge and understanding of anti-discriminatory and anti-oppressive practice within community development context. |
Sound demonstration of knowledge and understanding of anti-discriminatory and anti-oppressive practice within community development context. |
Satisfactory knowledge and understanding of the main issues of anti-discriminatory and anti-oppressive practice within community development context. |
Limited knowledge and understanding demonstrated. Relevant concepts and issues of anti-discriminatory and anti-oppressive practice are not dealt with sufficiently. |
Failure to demonstrate appropriate knowledge and understanding. Gaps in literature, limited discussion and lack of analysis. |
| Critically examine the impact of social policy and social divisions within a community context, highlighting central debates regarding the purpose of contemporary community practice.
|
Authoritative handling of complex material. Highly developed critical examination social policy and social divisions in theory and practice. Excellent analysis of the purpose of community development practice. |
Skilled handling of material and examination of social policy and social divisions and demonstrating a clear, critical awareness of the purpose of contemporary community practice. |
Satisfactory and systematic examination of social policy and social divisions with clear discussion regarding purpose of community practice.
|
Lacks adequate analysis and critical examination of social policy and social divisions within community practice. Gaps in awareness and application and limited appreciation of complexity of purpose. |
Failure to deal sufficiently with relevant issues and concepts. Obvious limitations in insight/range of comprehension. |
| Critically reflect on professional values and ethics, evaluating the tensions within contemporary community practice.
|
High level of awareness and exploration of professional values and ethics demonstrating a high level of understanding of the tensions in community practice. |
Detailed awareness and exploration of professional values and ethics, demonstrating a clear level of understanding of the tensions in community practice. |
Satisfactory exploration and reflection of professional values and ethics highlighting evidence of understanding of the tensions in community practice. |
Lacks detailed and critical exploration and reflection of professional values and ethics highlighting gaps in understanding. |
Failure to identify, explore and reflect on professional values and ethics, demonstrating a lack of understanding. |
| Presentation: well organised logical discussion, academic writing, appropriate use of sources, and accuracy of references.
|
Well structured. High degree of skill in use of references, and bibliographic material. Mature and fluent written style. |
Effective and mature style. Skilled use of references and bibliographic material. |
Satisfactory written style. Some competence with references and bibliography. |
Lacks competence in use of English. Use of references and bibliographic material inadequate or faulty. |
Poor literacy skills and competence in use of English. Poor referencing techniques. |
| Comments:
|
